Follow-up-Precision-Fix
This commit is contained in:
24
RETRIEX_FOLLOWUP_PRECISION_FIX_README.md
Normal file
24
RETRIEX_FOLLOWUP_PRECISION_FIX_README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
# RetrieX Follow-up Precision Fix
|
||||
|
||||
This patch tightens direct numeric follow-up handling without changing retrieval, scoring, shop, vector or database logic.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why
|
||||
|
||||
The follow-up query `mit welchem indikator wird der wert gemessen` could be treated too weakly as a technical product/value question because only `indikator` was a strong keyword. As a result, the stricter technical follow-up prompt rules were not always applied.
|
||||
|
||||
## Changes
|
||||
|
||||
- Adds `gemessen` / `measured` as technical prompt keywords.
|
||||
- Adds explicit prompt rules to answer direct indicator/value follow-ups with the exact mapping first.
|
||||
- Tells the model not to expand into the full indicator table, measurement principle, applications or advisory notes unless explicitly requested.
|
||||
- Adds `gemessen` to the regression/effective-config keyword check.
|
||||
|
||||
## Expected behavior
|
||||
|
||||
Question: `mit welchem indikator wird der wert gemessen` after the 0,02 °dH / Testomat 808 answer.
|
||||
|
||||
Expected answer starts like:
|
||||
|
||||
`Der Wert 0,02 °dH wird beim Testomat 808 mit Indikatortyp 300 gemessen.`
|
||||
|
||||
The full indicator table should only be shown when the user asks for all indicators or detailed device information.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user