update

templates/Prompt/Facts-Check.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ FACTS TO CHECK (per subblock):
 {facts}
 
 Check per subblock:
-1. **Evidence fidelity**: Does each `cited_facts` entry appear that way in the source (accurate in substance)? Is the source citation correct? With a source file: check against the file. Without a source: is it established standard knowledge?
+1. **Evidence fidelity**: Does each `cited_facts` entry appear that way in the source (accurate in substance)? Is the source citation correct? With source material (folder or excerpts): check against it. Without a source: is it established standard knowledge?
 2. **Factual correctness**: Are formulas, values, definitions, signatures technically correct? A wrong formula/value is a defect.
 3. **Fact vs. example**: Is a self-computed/invented example wrongly declared as `cited_facts`? That is a defect — it belongs in `example_idea`.
 4. Do NOT check examples (`example_idea`) for source evidence — they are generative.
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Note only REAL defects (wrong fact, wrong source, example disguised as a fact).
 - `verwerfen: true` — the subblock is substantively **not backable**: an invented claim, a bound/formula/assertion not findable in the material, or simply technically wrong. The subblock is then REMOVED. Be sure — when in doubt, `false`.
 - `verwerfen: false` — the core is right, only a fact/value/source is imprecise and correctable.
 
-Write ONLY the JSON file to: {out_path}
+Reply with ONLY the JSON — no other text, no code fences.
 
 Format — all in order:
 {{"ok": true}}