update

templates/Prompt/Relevance-Research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Rate each subblock of the topic "{topic}" by relevance: relevant or peripheral. The relevance controls whether a point goes into the focused guides or only into the complete guide.
+
+SUBBLOCKS (in brackets the parent block of the number; many state their core points with "Kern:"):
+{subblocks}
+
+Use the core points for a well-grounded rating — judge on the content, not just the title.
+
+Relevance:
+- **relevant**: core/standard knowledge that CARRIES the topic — central concepts, definitions, properties, common practice. For practical topics: what you need in actual use. For theoretical topics: central theorems/properties, EVEN without practical use. What you genuinely should know.
+- **peripheral**: a side note, special/niche case, "nice to know", deprecated/exotic — PLUS purely historical details (who/when), concrete numeric examples of a general principle, mere cross-references. NOT peripheral: a central theorem or a fundamental property just because it seems "theoretical". Belongs only in a complete guide.
+
+Rules:
+- These subblocks **all already** belong to the topic — the question is not *whether* but *how central*. Judge **core vs. peripheral within its own block**, one at a time.
+- `peripheral` is a **genuine category**, not a leftover bucket. Deliberately mark peripheral items (nice-to-know, special/niche cases, detail/numeric examples, historical notes, cross-references) as `peripheral`.
+- Don't bump the level up out of caution. Only **true core concepts / central theorems** are never `peripheral`.
+- Only judge — invent nothing, change no subblocks.
+
+Write ONLY the JSON file to: {out_path}
+
+Format (exactly one value for EACH number; no other text):
+{{"relevance": {{"1": "relevant", "2": "peripheral", "3": "relevant"}}}}
+{extra}