Files
creator/backend/config.py
2026-07-06 20:30:15 +02:00

313 lines
19 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
import os
from pathlib import Path
PROJECT_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
TEMPLATES_DIR = PROJECT_ROOT / "templates"
STORAGE_DIR = PROJECT_ROOT / "storage"
FRONTEND_DIST = PROJECT_ROOT / "frontend" / "dist"
DB_PATH = STORAGE_DIR / "creator.db"
PROJECTS_DIR = PROJECT_ROOT / "projects"
UNI_DIR = PROJECT_ROOT / "uni"
def _load_env(path: Path) -> None:
"""Mini .env loader (no dependency): KEY=VALUE lines. The FILE wins over inherited
env: a --reload master keeps its startup environment forever, so "existing env wins"
silently pinned stale values across .env edits (measured: file said 24, workers
inherited 15 for hours). Trade-off: ad-hoc shell overrides lose against the file."""
try:
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
except OSError:
return
for line in text.splitlines():
line = line.strip()
if not line or line.startswith("#") or "=" not in line:
continue
key, _, value = line.partition("=")
key, value = key.strip(), value.strip().strip('"').strip("'")
if key:
os.environ[key] = value
_load_env(PROJECT_ROOT / ".env")
MAX_CONCURRENT_GENERATIONS = 10
# Readability gate: deterministic checker (small German complexity model,
# scale 17). Sections that are too hard go into the read-exam revision.
# If transformers/torch or the model are missing → gate silently off.
READABILITY_ACTIVE = True
READABILITY_MODEL = "MiriUll/distilbert-german-text-complexity"
# Anchors on the 17 scale (TextComplexityDE): plain language ~1.2; Wikipedia average
# ~3.22; from MOS > 4 a sentence counts as "truly complex" (the paper's simplification cutoff).
READABILITY_MAX = 3.5 # section too hard when the sentence average is above this
READABILITY_HARD = 4.0 # an individual sentence is "hard" from here on
READABILITY_HARD_SHARE = 0.30 # … OR when this share of sentences is hard
# Kanban clustering: semantic embeddings drive the online title clustering and the
# candidate pairs of the pair check. If transformers/torch are missing or the model
# won't load → embedding silently off (all pairs go to the judge, clusters stay singletons).
EMBEDDING_AKTIV = True
EMBEDDING_MODELL = "sentence-transformers/paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2" # CPU, multilingual, ~470 MB
# Stronger (larger) CPU alternative if needed: "BAAI/bge-m3".
# Consolidation = two-stage: (1) the embedding builds COARSE similarity blocks (high recall),
# (2) an LLM judge groups EACH block into the real blocks (merge paraphrases, split
# over-merges). Pure threshold blocking creates a giant component (everything chained) →
# hence "capped blocking": greedily merge by cosine, but cap the block size. This keeps the
# LLM lists short and stable (evidenced: embedding block + LLM judge ≈ 95% precision).
EMBEDDING_BLOCK_FLOOR = 0.5 # minimum cosine for two candidates to share ONE block
EMBEDDING_BLOCK_CAP = 25 # max. titles per block (keep the LLM list short/stable)
# Subblock dedup: purely deterministic (no LLM). Subblocks are short statements IN THE SAME
# block context — from this cosine on two are the same statement (checked on aak: ≥0.88 are
# without exception true duplicates). Conservative 0.90 so different aspects (∈NP ≠ NP-hard) stay separate.
EMBEDDING_SUB_DUP = 0.90
# Variant folding BEFORE the subblock consensus count: finders rephrase the same concept each
# round, so exact-norm counting starves real concepts (measured Markdown run: 623/965 mentions
# discarded, „Zeichenkodierung" 73/74). 0.90 folds true paraphrases at ~0 false folds (0.85/0.88
# fold distinct aspects like ** vs ***). Antonym pairs measure 0.910.95 → negation guard required.
SUB_VARIANT_COS = 0.90
# Seed coverage check is LEXICAL first (token containment) — seeds are short fragment NAMES,
# subs are statements: true covers measure 0.270.38 while a wrong hit measured 0.76. The
# embedding stage only backs up the lexical one (catches „Line Breaks (Soft)" 0.888).
SEED_COVER_COS = 0.80
# Sub duplicate CANDIDATE floor for the judge paths (in-block consolidation band hint,
# cross-block stage, QA detector): the bulk of real paraphrase duplicates measures 0.750.90
# (Markdown: 50 pairs in the band, 4 above) — below every auto-merge threshold, so an LLM
# judge decides. Candidates only; a merge still needs judge unanimity.
SUB_DUP_KANDIDAT_COS = 0.75
# Cross-block judge pairs per call: ONE call over all pairs scaled its timeout to 54 min
# and a hung call blocked the barrier that long (aak: 196 pairs) — chunks cap it at ~15 min.
CROSS_CHUNK_PAARE = 40
# Umbrella grouping (block granularity level 2, step "Blocks-Gruppierung", AFTER the filter):
# collapse sibling DEFINITIONS that are components of ONE umbrella concept (TM model:
# Konfiguration/Start-/Folge-/Stopkonfiguration/Berechnung/Alphabet/δ; KNF: Literale/Klauseln/
# Variablen) into ONE block whose description ENUMERATES the children — so the later subblock step
# re-derives them from the source under the umbrella scope (demotion is re-derivation, not transfer).
# If the flag is off or no embedding model → step is silently skipped (like Dedup).
BLOCKS_GRUPPIERUNG_AKTIV = True
# Lower floor than consolidation (0.5, paraphrase-tuned) for higher sibling recall; the LLM judge is
# the precision gate. Smaller cap since a lower floor pulls in more nodes → keep the judge lists short.
EMBEDDING_SIBLING_FLOOR = 0.35 # heterogeneous facets of one model co-cluster weakly → low floor (recall)
EMBEDDING_SIBLING_CAP = 18 # a rich model (TM) can have many constituent parts
# Reconcile pass: two independently-judged clusters can emit the SAME parent concept under different
# titles (e.g. two „Turingmaschine"-umbrellas). Merge umbrella pairs whose title+description cosine is
# ≥ this (conservative → only true same-parent duplicates, never two distinct umbrellas).
GROUP_RECONCILE_FLOOR = 0.75
# Over-merge backstop ONLY (no-structure floor). Research (meronymy ≠ similarity): parts of ONE model are
# legitimately DISSIMILAR (TM: Alphabet/Konfiguration/δ ~0.22), while distinct same-type concepts (P/NP/…)
# are SIMILAR (~0.85) — so member-vs-member cosine is the WRONG instrument for over-merge (empirically
# inverted: TM 0.218 < the P/NP bundle 0.227). The real precision floor is the ATOMICITY type-guard
# (_GROUP_STANDALONE: a member that is a named algorithm/problem/theorem/complexity-class dissolves the
# umbrella). This floor is demoted to a near-zero backstop that only rejects a literally structureless
# chain (random-pair baseline), set BELOW the legitimate heterogeneous minimum so it never kills a real model.
GROUP_MIN_COS_FLOOR = 0.15
# Fragment-demote backstop, same logic as GROUP_MIN_COS_FLOOR: fragment↔parent cosine is a BAD
# fragment detector (measured, Markdown run: wrong demotes Blockzitate→Codeblöcke 0.353 and
# Zeichenkodierung→Überschriften 0.640 sit ABOVE any usable floor, while true NP proof-gadget
# demotes αu-Variablen→Cook/Levin 0.172 sit low). So this only vetoes judge/panel demotes with
# NO containment match whose pair is literally structureless (Emoji→Tabelle 0.136).
FRAGMENT_MIN_COS = 0.15
# Caps for concurrent CLI agent processes (env-overridable). Two nested limits, both always active:
# a per-topic cap and a global cap across all topics. Defaults 10/10 = previous behavior (global
# dominates). Locally raise the global cap to actually parallelize across topics (per-topic stays 10).
# Own lane for interactive calls (chat, elements) so they don't hang behind running writers.
MAX_CONCURRENT_AGENTS = int(os.getenv("MAX_CONCURRENT_AGENTS", "16")) # global, all topics
# Per-topic higher than the process cap: it is SHARED between process and API tier — at 12 a
# single-topic run (the normal case) would never benefit from the cheap API tier.
MAX_CONCURRENT_AGENTS_PER_TOPIC = int(os.getenv("MAX_CONCURRENT_AGENTS_PER_TOPIC", "24")) # per topic
# Direct-API text calls (agents._run_text_api): ~0 RAM, only network — own, higher global cap.
MAX_CONCURRENT_API_AGENTS = int(os.getenv("MAX_CONCURRENT_API_AGENTS", "28"))
MAX_CONCURRENT_INTERACTIVE = 8
# RAM guard for opencode spawns: below this free share (MemAvailable/MemTotal in %) new
# processes wait instead of starting (agents._ram_gate). 0 = off.
RAM_MIN_FREE_PCT = int(os.getenv("RAM_MIN_FREE_PCT", "20"))
# Grace window of the consensus races (blocks, guide, OnePager): after the first
# valid result the remaining agents may still become done for this many seconds
# (kill only once the minimum is already in).
CONSENSUS_GRACE = 300
# Cap of the clarification and check loops: maximum rounds until everything must be
# decided. In the last round the mapping agent MUST decide every entry;
# check loops leave any remaining objections standing after that.
CONSENSUS_MAX_ROUNDS = 3
# QA gate: after the inventory phase an automatic QA run scores the blocks; below the
# threshold the flow PAUSES before board 2 burns tokens (frontend offers force-continue).
QA_GATE_NOTE = 9.5 # 0 = gate off; quota-based, so the tolerated finding count scales with topic size
QA_GATE_LLM = True # include the LLM samples (Echtheit/Dubletten) in the gate run
# Inline evidence for judge agents: corpus excerpts go INTO the prompt instead of letting
# every judge re-search the source folder (measured: ~10 tool turns/judge, 82 % of the
# run's tokens were cache reads from those loops).
EVIDENCE_BUDGET_CHARS = 48_000 # max excerpt characters per judge prompt
EVIDENCE_CTX_LINES = 15 # context lines around a cited source position (facts check)
# ── Pipeline tuning (zentral, tunebar via CREATOR_PARAMS — siehe Override-Hook am Datei-Ende;
# Registry mit Suchraum: backend/train_params.py). QA-/Detektor-Konstanten bleiben bewusst in
# qa.py/guide_qa.py — die Messlatte darf nie Teil des Suchraums sein. ─────────────────────────
SUBBLOCK_MAX = 40 # chunk cap
RESEARCH_BATCH = 1 # eine Seite pro Reader — er kann nichts übersehen (Vollständigkeit)
RESEARCH_READERS = 2 # reader agents per batch/section (consensus ≥2)
RESEARCH_THEMA_AGENTS = 5 # web mode (source "thema")
RESEARCH_SECTION_CHARS = 12000 # uni/projekt section size (lost-in-the-middle guard)
RESEARCH_RUNTIME = 900 # one research agent, one round (tail ingests live)
DEDUP_PAIR_FLOOR = 0.6 # min cosine for a candidate pair
DEDUP_PAIRS_CHUNK = 40 # pairs per judge package
DEDUP_TITLE_AUTO = 0.95 # near-identical TITLE cosine → merge without judge
DEDUP_GLOBAL_FLOOR = 0.65 # global post-naming dedup candidate floor
FILTER_CHUNK = 35 # blocks per judge in the degrade pass
CONSOLIDATION_PANEL = 3 # mapping judges per chunk
# Board 2, verschmolzene Calls (block_calls.py): Panel-Größen der neuen Struktur.
# Konsens braucht ≥2 unabhängige Nennungen bzw. Einstimmigkeit — 2 ist das Minimum,
# 3 kauft Robustheit für +50 % Tokens auf dem jeweiligen Segment.
GEN_PANEL = 2 # unabhängige Generator-Calls pro Block
VERIFY_PANEL = 2 # unabhängige Prüfer-Calls pro Block (+ Ersatz bei 1 Ausfall)
ART_SPLIT_SUBS = 20 # Artefakt-Generator splittet ab so vielen Subs in 2 parallele Calls
FILTER_RECHECK_PANEL = 3 # judges in the survivor-recheck
GATE_FIX_MIN = 3 # fact-gate: unbelegt-claims below min(this, relevante Subs) → log only (falsch fixt immer)
ZIELE_MAX = 12 # Lernziele-Cap pro Block (mehr verwässert Coverage-Prüfung und Writer-Fokus)
# Prüfer-Längenband um guide_qa.block_budget: enger als das QA-Band (0.351.5), damit der
# Fix VOR der QA-Grenze greift. Die QA-Messlatte selbst bleibt bewusst in guide_qa.py.
FIX_LAENGE_BAND = (0.5, 1.2)
WRITER_SPLIT_SUBS = 30 # guide writer splits sections above this sub count
KANBAN_BATCH = 5 # cards a worker pulls per micro-batch
MAX_CARD_RETRIES = 3 # failures per card → dead-letter
RETRY_BACKOFF = 30.0 # base seconds; backoff = base · 2^(retries-1)
MAX_RESTARTS = 2 # agent restart cap per race slot
INFRA_MAX_RETRIES = 3 # 429/Timeout/Netz: Retries pro Slot, dann Lauf-Pause (kein fail-open)
INFRA_BACKOFF_BASE = 8.0 # Pause = base · 2^(n-1) → 8/16/32 s
# Stall-Hedge: läuft ein Race-Slot so lange ohne Ergebnis, startet parallel ein Zwilling
# (key -h), der erste valide gewinnt. Gemessen (kanban-smoke): 4 Panel-Stalls à 160230 s
# verlängerten den kritischen Pfad um ~5 min. UNTERGRENZE: effektiv gilt
# max(HEDGE_NACH_S, halbes Call-Timeout) — pauschale 90 s hedgten jeden gesunden
# Fix-/Gate-Call (die laufen normal 110135 s). 0 = aus.
HEDGE_NACH_S = 90
JUDGE_CHUNK = 40 # repair: findings per judge call
EVENTS_RETENTION_TAGE = 60 # events älter als das werden beim Start gelöscht (Tabelle wuchs unbegrenzt)
EVIDENCE_PER_BLOCK = 6000 # repair: excerpt chars per fremd candidate
ABSCHLUSS_QA_LLM = 1 # 0 = Abschluss-QA ohne LLM-Judges (Training misst selbst; spart Minuten)
# Timeouts per agent step: (base seconds, seconds per block/section).
# Applies equally to all providers — whoever is too slow gets restarted or overtaken.
TIMEOUTS = {
"research_mapping": (600, 3), # n = pre-merged entries
"selection_mapping": (600, 2), # n = remaining entries (block inventory)
"ergaenzung": (600, 0), # subject-field extension for projects (web research)
"plan": (300, 5),
"plan_judge": (600, 5), # judge reads up to 5 outlines, n = sections
# Judge caps tightened 2026-07-04: judge p50 is 672 s; a stalled call burns the whole
# cap and its retry heals in seconds — the old 300 s base tripled the stall cost.
"subblock_check": (150, 10), # judge decides contested subblocks in the chunk
"relevance": (300, 10), # subblocks relevant/peripheral per chunk
# Board 2, verschmolzene Calls: größere Outputs pro Call, dafür wenige Segmente
"generate": (450, 0), # Subs+Facts+Level in einem (Sub-Zahl vorab unbekannt)
"verify": (300, 10), # Audit über alle Subs (n = Subs), key points gekappt
"fix": (300, 15), # Korrekturen + Lücken (n = Aufträge)
"artefakt": (450, 15), # Fragen+Karten+Beispiele (n = Subs)
"artefakt_check": (200, 8), # Beispiel-Verifikation + Fragen-Kritik (n = Subs)
"writer": (450, 60), # per section — split keeps sections ≤30 subs
# guide board (per card = one block)
"lernziele": (300, 5), # backward-design objectives per block
"pruefer": (600, 5), # verschmolzener Qualitäts-Pass (Gate+Coverage+Lese) per block
# QA/Repair-Judge-Wellen (qa.judge_wave) — außerhalb der Boards, keine n-Skalierung
"qa_judge": (600, 0),
}
# Provider stacks: completely independent, any one can be removed at any time.
# Roles: "quick" = bulk work (research, classification),
# "fast" = interaction + voting (chat, exam, clarification, elements),
# "judge" = mapping/judge/check agents — cold (low temperature,
# no thinking) for stable verdicts; Claude/local map to "fast",
# "guide" = large generation (proposals, writer).
# Kein Provider-Default im Code (Betreiber-Vorgabe): die .env entscheidet.
DEFAULT_PROVIDER = os.getenv("DEFAULT_PROVIDER", "")
if not DEFAULT_PROVIDER:
raise RuntimeError("DEFAULT_PROVIDER fehlt in der .env (z. B. DEFAULT_PROVIDER=minimax)")
PROVIDERS = {
"claude": {
"cli": "claude",
"guide": "claude-opus-4-8[1m]",
"fast": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
"judge": "claude-sonnet-4-6", # the CLI has no temperature setting
"quick": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
"env_key": None, # auth via CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN or ~/.claude
},
# "minimax-kalt/…" is NOT its own stack, just an opencode provider entry
# (dev-ops/opencode.json) with low temperature; M3 there without thinking.
"minimax": {
"cli": "opencode",
"guide": "minimax/MiniMax-M3",
"fast": "minimax-kalt/MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"judge": "minimax/MiniMax-M3", # native route — the kalt endpoint stalled 20 % of
# judge calls to the timeout cap (516/2590, 2026-07-04)
"quick": "minimax/MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed",
"env_key": "MINIMAX_API_KEY",
},
"lokal": {
"cli": "opencode",
"guide": "ollama/qwen3.6:27b",
"fast": "ollama/qwen3.5:9b",
"judge": "ollama/qwen3.5:9b",
"quick": "ollama/qwen3.5:9b",
"env_key": None,
"check_url": "http://localhost:11434/api/tags", # Ollama reachable?
},
}
# Role routing: by DEFAULT the run's provider (the UI choice) handles ALL roles —
# the role only picks the model WITHIN that stack (PROVIDERS[stack][role]).
# Opt-in cross-provider mixing via env: ROLE_JUDGE=claude routes every judge call
# to the claude stack regardless of the UI choice ("provider:model" pins a model).
ROLE_ROUTING = {
"quick": os.getenv("ROLE_QUICK", ""),
"judge": os.getenv("ROLE_JUDGE", ""),
"guide": os.getenv("ROLE_GUIDE", ""),
"fast": os.getenv("ROLE_FAST", ""),
}
def resolve_role(run_provider: str, role: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
"""→ (provider, model) for one agent call. Pure routing, no availability check —
the caller (agents.run_agent) falls back to run_provider if the target is unavailable."""
target = ROLE_ROUTING.get(role, "") or run_provider
provider, _, model = target.partition(":")
if provider not in PROVIDERS:
provider, model = run_provider, ""
if not model:
model = PROVIDERS.get(provider, {}).get(role, "")
return provider, model
# ── Trainings-Override: CREATOR_PARAMS (JSON-Dict im ENV) überschreibt gleichnamige
# Tuning-Konstanten oben — pro Prozess-Start (der Trainer startet je Trial einen Subprozess;
# Module binden die Werte beim Import). TIMEOUTS-Einträge via "TIMEOUT_<step>_base"/"_per".
def _apply_param_overrides() -> None:
raw = os.getenv("CREATOR_PARAMS")
if not raw:
return
import json as _json
try:
overrides = _json.loads(raw)
except ValueError:
raise SystemExit(f"CREATOR_PARAMS ist kein gültiges JSON: {raw[:80]}")
g = globals()
for key, val in overrides.items():
if key.startswith("TIMEOUT_"):
rest = key[len("TIMEOUT_"):]
step, _, part = rest.rpartition("_")
if step in TIMEOUTS and part in ("base", "per"):
base, per = TIMEOUTS[step]
TIMEOUTS[step] = (val, per) if part == "base" else (base, val)
continue
raise SystemExit(f"CREATOR_PARAMS: unbekannter Timeout-Schlüssel {key}")
if key not in g or not isinstance(g[key], (int, float)) or isinstance(g[key], bool):
raise SystemExit(f"CREATOR_PARAMS: unbekannter/nicht-numerischer Parameter {key}")
g[key] = type(g[key])(val)
_apply_param_overrides()