25 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
25 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
# RetrieX Follow-up Precision Fix
|
|
|
|
This patch tightens direct numeric follow-up handling without changing retrieval, scoring, shop, vector or database logic.
|
|
|
|
## Why
|
|
|
|
The follow-up query `mit welchem indikator wird der wert gemessen` could be treated too weakly as a technical product/value question because only `indikator` was a strong keyword. As a result, the stricter technical follow-up prompt rules were not always applied.
|
|
|
|
## Changes
|
|
|
|
- Adds `gemessen` / `measured` as technical prompt keywords.
|
|
- Adds explicit prompt rules to answer direct indicator/value follow-ups with the exact mapping first.
|
|
- Tells the model not to expand into the full indicator table, measurement principle, applications or advisory notes unless explicitly requested.
|
|
- Adds `gemessen` to the regression/effective-config keyword check.
|
|
|
|
## Expected behavior
|
|
|
|
Question: `mit welchem indikator wird der wert gemessen` after the 0,02 °dH / Testomat 808 answer.
|
|
|
|
Expected answer starts like:
|
|
|
|
`Der Wert 0,02 °dH wird beim Testomat 808 mit Indikatortyp 300 gemessen.`
|
|
|
|
The full indicator table should only be shown when the user asks for all indicators or detailed device information.
|