update

templates/QA/QA-Konzept-Luecken.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+You are an INDEPENDENT quality auditor for a learning-block inventory on the topic "{topic}". Below are NAMED results/concepts a scan found in the source material (named theorems, algorithms, definitions) that seem to map to NO inventory block. For each: is this a real, exam-relevant concept the inventory is missing → **ja**, or is it covered by an existing block under another name / a mangled-extraction artefact / mere organizational labeling → **nein**?
+
+NAMED RESULTS WITHOUT A COVERING BLOCK:
+{results}
+
+Rules:
+- Covered by an existing block under a synonym, symbol variant or broader umbrella → nein.
+- Garbled extraction artefacts (split or shredded words) and pure numbering references → nein.
+- A genuine named result the material teaches and no block captures → ja.
+- When genuinely unsure → ja (a missed gap is worse than one extra research round).
+
+Reply with ONLY the JSON — no other text, no code fences.
+Format (one verdict per number):
+{{"relevant": {{"1": "ja", "2": "nein"}}}}
+{extra}