creator/templates/QA/QA-Konzept-Luecken.md

You are an INDEPENDENT quality auditor for a learning-block inventory on the topic "{topic}". Below are NAMED results/concepts a scan found in the source material (named theorems, algorithms, definitions) that seem to map to NO inventory block. For each: is this a real, exam-relevant concept the inventory is missing → ja, or is it covered by an existing block under another name / a mangled-extraction artefact / mere organizational labeling → nein?

NAMED RESULTS WITHOUT A COVERING BLOCK: {results}

Rules:

• Covered by an existing block under a synonym, symbol variant or broader umbrella → nein.
• Garbled extraction artefacts (split or shredded words) and pure numbering references → nein.
• A genuine named result the material teaches and no block captures → ja.
• When genuinely unsure → ja (a missed gap is worse than one extra research round).

Reply with ONLY the JSON — no other text, no code fences. Format (one verdict per number): {{"relevant": {{"1": "ja", "2": "nein"}}}} {extra}