15 lines
1019 B
Markdown
15 lines
1019 B
Markdown
You are an INDEPENDENT quality auditor for a learning-block inventory on the topic "{topic}". Below are NAMED results/concepts a scan found in the source material (named theorems, algorithms, definitions) that seem to map to NO inventory block. For each: is this a real, exam-relevant concept the inventory is missing → **ja**, or is it covered by an existing block under another name / a mangled-extraction artefact / mere organizational labeling → **nein**?
|
|
|
|
NAMED RESULTS WITHOUT A COVERING BLOCK:
|
|
{results}
|
|
|
|
Rules:
|
|
- Covered by an existing block under a synonym, symbol variant or broader umbrella → nein.
|
|
- Garbled extraction artefacts (split or shredded words) and pure numbering references → nein.
|
|
- A genuine named result the material teaches and no block captures → ja.
|
|
- When genuinely unsure → ja (a missed gap is worse than one extra research round).
|
|
|
|
Reply with ONLY the JSON — no other text, no code fences.
|
|
Format (one verdict per number):
|
|
{{"relevant": {{"1": "ja", "2": "nein"}}}}
|
|
{extra} |